|
Back in May 2021,
iolo's Affiliate Masterclass covered Google's latest initiative,
Federated Learning of
Cohorts (FLoC). The article we covered was Ars Technica's
GO FLOC YOURSELF -- Everybody hates "FLoC," Google's tracking plan for
Chrome ads.
Good news and bad
news. The good news first. FLoC is canceled! (Yay?) The bad news? It will be
replaced with 'Topics'.
On the surface,
for the ad industry at least, it looks like; 'Out of the frying pan into the
fire'.
Like everyone, we
keep a close eye on things as they unfold.
FLoC is dead. But Topics won't fix Google's
ad targeting problems.
"It just seems like rearranging deck chairs on
the sinking ship of targeted ads."
Google broke the
internet last year with its plan to break the internet last year.
Of course, I'm talking about
FLoC, Google's poorly named plan to kill off the third-party cookie and
allow advertisers to target "cohorts" of anonymous users instead. It managed
to piss off everyone, with privacy groups calling it invasive and the ad
industry calling it anticompetitive.
Yesterday, Google killed off FLoC, announcing it's replacing it with a shiny
new ad-targeting tool called
Topics. The idea behind Topics is pretty simple. It's an API that uses
people's browsing history to infer their interests in broad topics like,
say, fitness. The API will share a rotating subset of those interests with
publishers, who can then use them to serve targeted ads on their sites.
Users can also delete topics they don't want shared in what Google argues is
a much better deal for privacy.
But if Google was expecting a standing ovation from FLoC's critics, it might
have been disappointed. The company's plan for Topics has, so far, gotten
something between a lukewarm and icy response from the very people who
called for FLoC's demise.
"It just seems like rearranging deck chairs on the sinking ship of targeted
ads," said Justin Brookman, director of Consumer Privacy at Consumer
Reports.
"There's no way to spin this as anything other than a new privacy violation
being built into your browser," said Bennett Cyphers, staff technologist at
the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
There's no doubt Topics is a slight improvement over FLoC, Cyphers and
Brookman acknowledged, but it hardly satisfies the growing movement calling
for the eradication of behavioral ad targeting altogether. That includes not
just advocates, but
lots of Democrats in Congress and
lawmakers in Europe who have recently pushed for legislation that would
ban targeted ads.
In its announcement, Google emphasized the importance of giving people
control over the topics that advertisers use to target them. "Because Topics
is powered by the browser, it provides you with a more recognizable way to
see and control how your data is shared, compared to tracking mechanisms
like third-party cookies," the post read.
But privacy hawks argue that user controls can be the enemy of offering
people true privacy in the first place. "It's just not feasible for someone
to track and control their Topics on a week-by-week basis: Who would do
that?!" Brookman said.
As it happens, Facebook pitched a
similar proposal last year but changed course due to privacy concerns.
"If automatic inferences are returned based on behavioral data, there is a
risk of sensitive information disclosure. I think this is a fair point,"
Facebook engineer Ben Savage wrote in an online discussion group regarding
the proposal.
But just because the privacy world hates Topics doesn't mean the ad world
loves it. It may not kill ad targeting, but it will cut ad-tech firms and
publishers off from a whole lot of web browsing data they currently have
access to -- data Google, which owns the biggest browser in the world, will
continue to have access to.
To continue reading the article, please
click here.
If you have any
questions/comments on the above, please email
us.
|
